I REFER to letter from Christopher Reekie (February 13) and John Birkett (February 14). It was no part of my intention to belittle Britain’s role in this conflict or, in case of doubt, to act as an apologist for Stalin’s abominable regime: simply to put matters into perspective.
But for the English Channel Britain would have been over-run. In any case though, with Western Europe subjugated, Hitler could direct the full weight of the Wehrmacht towards his primary, deluded, obsessions: lebensraum; the enslavement of the Slavic Untermensch and the elimination of Jewry.
To pick out only one element prayed in aid about Britain’s contribution. Whilst the Allies did indeed send material (overwhelmingly produced in the US) to Russia this was tactically to sustain the latter’s struggles to provide time to prepare for the Normandy invasion. But steel? Russia was largely self-sufficient. The key here, as the Germans advanced, was the logistically remarkable physical transfer of the Don Basin armaments factories behind the Urals as the Germans advanced. Where, indeed, the mass production of the T34 tank began which undid the German Tigers at Kursk.
But to the bigger picture. In the end, it is the will of peoples, not leaders, that determine outcomes. So to facts:
Military deaths: Soviet Union (minimum) eight million; Germany 3.5 million; Britain 260,000. Civilian deaths: Soviet Union (minimum) 16 million; Germany 780,000; Britain 92,000 (source: Norman Davies, Europe,1996, Appendix 111, p1328, Tables 2 and 3).
So some recognition of proportionality please?
Leslie Smith,
144-8 Commercial Street, Leith.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel