IT seems that Leslie Smith is keen to promote the cause of Russia's contribution to winning the Second World War (Letters, February 18). I do not dispute the enormous losses the Soviet Union suffered, but, to have some recognition of proportionality, he is writing with the knowledge of hindsight and having available all the statistics since produced. As I lived through the whole war, I can claim to know how conditions were at the time. In 1940, Hitler prepared to invade Britain. He was thwarted, not by the English Channel, but by the courage of the RAF in the Battle of Britain.
Hitler's invasion of Russia in June 1941 was a surprise, and I remember my mother saying with relief that he had eased the pressure on us and had made a mistake. Japan's attack on America at Pearl Harbor in December 1941 also came as a shock, and I recall my sense that we were no longer alone, after the long anxious experience before then. With Russia and America now involved, the tide turned against the Axis, but the outcome was by no means assured. Many battles and much grief still lay ahead. No-one can predict the future with certainty, and that was as true throughout the war as it is now. What I do know is that Britain's decision, inspired by Churchill, to fight on after Dunkirk changed the course of history and laid the foundation for final victory.
Christopher Reekie,
12 Orchard Drive, Edinburgh.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel