THE case for ship to ship (STS) oil transfers at the Cromarty Firth – never very strong to begin with – has been weakened further by the release of Maritime and Coastguard Agency (MCA) papers.
Earlier this year, it told local port officials to resubmit an application which appears to have been lacking.
It failed to pay sufficient heed to the potential risk to Scotland’s only resident pod of bottlenose dolphins. It failed, indeed, to explain why such oil transfers were necessary, particularly given a safer alternative exists at Nigg terminal’s jetty. Oil spill modelling failed to reflect the full range of weather, wind and tidal factors. Even its worst case scenario appears to have been minimised.
We may take on board the views of some experienced seamen that STS risks are minimal – in general – but a comprehensive case regarding all contingencies in this most sensitive of maritime areas must be provided. This is a project that would involve 48 transfers, 576 vessel movements and 8.6 million tonnes of oil a year.
Given that scale of the operation, the revelation that responding to any spill in the firth could take four hours, during which oil might reach an important bird colony, is deeply worrying. This application needs to be properly thought out. As it stands, it’s unsurprising community campaigners and environmental organisations want it thrown out.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here