AS one of Rev PS Aiken’s “so-called” theologians, I suggest his categorical condemnation of gay marriage (Letters, April 21) relies too much on scattered fragments of Scripture. Christians have form when it comes to cherry-picking phrases to defend traditional beliefs and even used dodgy Biblical quotes to support slavery and the subjugation of women.
A willingness to conduct Ruth Davidson’s wedding whatever her political beliefs may be “scandalous” as Graeme McCormick (Letters, April 21) suggests but the fact is that in 35 years as a parish minister I never once interrogated an engaged couple on the subject of their politics. Perhaps naïvely I believed it was absolutely none of my business.
Rev Dr John Cameron,
10 Howard Place, St Andrews.
THE long-awaited announcement by former General Assembly Moderator the Very Rev John Chalmers (“Kirk in landmark apology over gay discrimination “, The Herald, April 18 ) had barely been voiced when contrary views were resurrected by the Rev. Mike Goss on behalf of Covenant Fellowship Scotland. It is my understanding the latter body is a splinter group but still under the auspices of C of S control.
It really does not assist sincere placatory attempts to heal divisions within the church by attempting to reverse the welcome apology statement. Many Church of Scotland members will only be further confused by these contradictory stances. Conversely many others will identify the constant bickering and lack of compassion as to why they are no longer active in church life. "To see ourselves as others do" is so apt in this particular saga.
Allan C Steele,
22 Forres Avenue, Giffnock.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel