ROB Gibson (Letters, June 14) is absolutely right that repopulation and rewilding should go hand in hand. The John Muir Trust has never argued for preservation of the wet desert monoculture that blights most of the Highlands. We have long advocated that ecological restoration of the land is essential in supporting thriving local communities, as well as benefiting nature. Revival of our native forests can bring much of our land back to life, help repopulate the Highlands and reduce our carbon emissions much more effectively than simply allowing multinational energy companies and landowners to exploit our wild places for private interests.
The John Muir Trust supported the Scottish Natural Heritage Wild Land Areas map approved and recognised by the Scottish Government in in 2014 to provide a degree of regulation and protection for our nation’s most precious landscape assets. We can tackle climate change and develop renewables without destroying these areas.
In that, we are in tune with the overwhelming majority of the Scottish public, not least in the Highlands and Islands, where the latest YouGov poll shows that 60 per cent “strongly agree” with continued protection of the Wild Land Areas from large-scale development, and a further 20 per cent “tend to agree”. Overall, the poll found that 16 times more people – both nationally and in the Highlands – support protection of Wild Land Areas for the benefit of all of the people of Scotland.
Mike Daniels,
John Muir Trust,
Tower House, Station Road, Pitlochry.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel