Vicky Allan’s excellent and timely report omits to mention an important point (A cashless society ... Utopia or dystopia?, Technology, July 9).
It was recognised in Athens and Sparta 10 centuries BC that a vital prerogatives of the state was the sole right to issue money. In our country, initially, only the sovereign had the power to issue money. Eventually, banks arose to store people’s spare money (gold coin). But by lending this spare cash at interest back to the public, these banks usurped the power of the sovereign. Soon, the amount of money created by them far exceeded that created by the sovereign.
In 2014, the total money supply was £2.1 trillion – but 97 per cent of this had been created out of nothing by the banks as loans; only 3 per cent, £62 billion, had been issued as notes and coins by the Bank of England. It is a myth that banks lend only what they have in their vaults; banks have a licence to create money out of nothing.
Almost without knowing it, we have transferred huge, unaccountable power to the banks and card companies. Most of the money supply is controlled by 56 unelected individuals – the directors of the five major banks.
We are now in the final stage of the total usurpation of the creation and management of money by banks and card companies via the digitalisation of the entire financial system and the disappearance of banks from the high street. Very soon plastic cards will be the sole means of paying for all goods and services, and when that day dawns, the entire financial system will be in the hands of those few private banks. And, of course, more insidiously, those same banks will have the power to monitor your every purchase.
Doug Clark
Midlothian
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel