The Wanlockhead Community Trust takes issue with a statement by Buccleuch CEO John Glen (Aristocrat Buccleuch’s wind farm plan risks unearthing lead contamination, Environment, September 3). He says: “[MSP Joan McAlpine’s] suggestion that this proposal undermines a local community right to buy shows a lack of knowledge that the [windfarm] initiative was conceived and progressed before any suggestion of a community right to buy ...”
The Wanlockhead buyout was initiated almost two years before news of a potential wind farm was made public. In 2013, community groups began holding meetings with Buccleuch Estates regarding potential buyout of land. In 2014, Wanlockhead villagers attended a public meeting that led to the Leadhills Community Company’s creation.
By mid-2014, talks with the Duke of Buccleuch had stalled following changes in personnel. In late 2014, Wanlockhead residents decided to further pursue their buyout initiative. Volunteers spent 2015 learning about buyouts, meeting government bodies and NGOs including the Scottish Land Fund and Community Land Scotland. (In April 2015, the village was shocked to first learn of the Duke of Buccleuch’s windfarm plans.)
In January 2016, a public meeting in Wanlockhead confirmed the village’s intention to channel buyout efforts through a trust. In spring 2016, a community consultation was carried out to identify areas of land the trust should pursue. Meetings with the Buccleuch Estate followed in August and October, 2016 to discuss potential land transfer to the community. On May 23, 2017, we submitted to the Scottish Government our first application to register a right to buy land. This winter we will finalise our feasibility study. We look forward to working with all parties to ensure a bright future for Wanlockhead.
Lincoln Richford, Chair
Wanlockhead Community Trust
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here