EVERY year millions of pounds are poured into the NHS. Every year there is a winter health crisis and every year the NHS is kicked around as a political football by every political party.
Before the NHS was established, health care for the majority in the UK was at best patchy and at worst unaffordable and non-existent, with women, children and the elderly suffering the most. Its founder, Aneurin Bevan, envisaged that, in time, the establishment of the NHS would improve the nation’s health and that the demand for its services would decrease; the opposite has happened.
At present, some 40 per cent of all health problems are as a result of lifestyle choices. Added to this there is an expanding ageing population with accompanying health and social care needs. It is clear that the NHS in it present form is not fit for purpose and that long-term planning and restructuring are required.
It is also clear that this task is too important for the short-term vision of all the political parties. We need this to be taken out of the political arena and placed with a Royal Commission made up of experts in the fields of medicine and health and social care who would be charged with planning a National Health Service for the next 30 or more years, not the a five-year political cycle.
Paul Lewis,
99 Guardwell Crescent, Edinburgh.
DR Gerald Edwards (Letters, January 4) finds that the daily headlines reporting SNP failures suggest that independence would be catastrophic.
He should not believe everything he reads in the newspapers. Were he to look beyond often reflexively hostile headlines and seek out the evidence, he would find that the health service in Scotland is better run than elsewhere in the UK; that attainment of school leavers has increased steadily since 2007; that pre-school childcare is being transformed; that significant progress is being made on reducing Scotland’s carbon footprint; that the Tories’ senseless welfare policies are being mitigated; and that Scotland puts the rest of the UK to shame by its inclusive policy towards refugees.
At the same time, more progressive taxation has been introduced, large-scale infrastructure projects have been completed, free prescriptions, care in old age and university tuition have been maintained. There is more to do. But that these measures have been achieved under the limited powers available to the Scottish Government serves to underline what more we should expect in an independent country.
Paddy Farrington
46 Marchmont Road, Edinburgh.
THE issue of hospital hygiene as raised by Patricia Allison (Letters, January 5) invites comment. BBC Scotland reported a visit of primary age youngsters to a care home for the elderly. The friendly interaction was somewhat spoiled by hugging and kissing. Surely such well-intended gestures should be discouraged especially in hospital or care home facilities.
Allan C Steele,
22 Forres Avenue, Giffnock.
SHAME on the UK Government. Cancel Trident because we cannot afford it and give us back our NHS.
Linda FitzGerald,
Dalerb, Craignavie Road, Killin.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here