OUR roads are becoming increasingly hostile and stressful because of excessive light being emitted by traffic.
Chiefly to blame for this madness has to be the motor industry for manufacturing vehicles with over-powerful LED headlights in a variety of quirky designs with fashion rather than safety as a priority. To add to the problem, some drivers are failing to adjust their lights correctly, others are routinely switching on fog lamps even in conditions of clear visibility, and a few park and wait outside shops with their lights fully ablaze. In response to this over-abundance, extreme cyclists are now using ultra-bright LED lights in a number of disturbing flash modes, not even moderating their output when cycling close to pedestrians on traffic-free routes.
The daily commute to and from work in the town or city during the dark winter months has become a lightmare. It's bad for road safety and bad for health. It's especially concerning for those who are sensitive to blindingly bright or flashing lights. Initiatives are needed at both national and local level to address this issue. In particular, road users should be made to abide by Rule 114 of the Highway Code which makes it illegal to use lights that dazzle.
R M Atkinson,
16 Argyll Terrace, Edinburgh.
RICHARD Ardern (Letters, February 6) is right to call out the dichotomy between the demands of music venues and the worries about hearing damage. Last week in my gym I asked if the loud background music could be turned down. “I’m afraid that’s impossible”, came the reply, “because someone has asked us to turn the music up.” Why should those who want more noise take priority over those who want less?
Dorothy Lewis,
5 Paisley Avenue, Edinburgh.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here