ONE reads, with a measure of incredulity, that Tony Blair is the first British recipient of an award for leadership in memory of Abraham Lincoln ("Blair first to win Lincoln award", The Herald, March 9). It is verging on the surreal for the name of Blair to be linked with that of the 16th President of the United States of America.
Lincoln fought successfully through a Civil War to preserve the Union, issued the Emancipation Proclamation with regard to slavery, and made appointments regardless of military standing and political party. He was astute, inspirational and honourable. He became such an iconic and revered figure that a white marble temple was erected in his memory in Washington.
Mr Blair, on the other hand, led Britain to join with the United States in the questionably-legal invasion of Iraq. Consider the condition of that country today. Here was a Prime Minister, who promised so much with regard to improving Britain’s welfare, education and health services. Richard Wilson, former Cabinet Secretary, when Mr Blair was Prime Minister, once observed: "There are events during my period as Cabinet Secretary that make me shudder at what I remember because we had high hopes and we were so disappointed. He promised so much , but in the end so little was achieved." Moreover, since extracting himself from politics, Mr Blair has proceeded to make vast sums working for numerous dictators handing out advice.
The Abraham Lincoln Presidential Library Foundation may have thought that it was embellishing the reputation of Mr Blair by so acting. If it so believes, it has done so at the cost of damaging its own.
Ian W Thomson,
38 Kirkintilloch Road, Lenzie.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel