WHAT a remarkable letter from your correspondent Bill Brown (March 13). He claims not to be anti-Gaelic and then proceeds to spend the rest of the letter being precisely that, claiming the mere sight of Gaelic on signage outside the Gàidhealtachd is an act of oppression that is intolerable and will see him forced to wear a kilt and attend the Mod. He goes on to claim that the 2005 Gaelic Language Act is culturally illegitimate and prejudicial to harmony amongst Scots and harmful to good integration of immigrants. How so?
The fact is, there is absolutely no confusion amongst Scots or immigrants that English is the predominant language of Scotland. There is no threat to the English language from signage or TV and radio in Gaelic. To argue thus is to revel in a rather bizarre inverted victimhood that has no basis in reality.
What there is, is a recognition of Gaelic's historic importance in Scottish culture and the incredibly damaging and deleterious effects of centuries of suppression of the language. Countries can cope with being multilingual. Given that we can hardly even pretend that Scotland is so with the numbers involved, what great difficulty or challenge is there in seeking to redress historic wrongs and give Gaelic – part of our rich cultural history whether a Gael or not – a helping hand?
Michael Rossi,
66 Canalside Gardens, Southall, Middlesex.
I AM not anti-Gaelic says Bill Brown in his latest anti Gaelic rant. Well, you could have fooled me.
The problem is there is not that there is too much Gaelic in public use,but rather that there is not enough.
Note the picture of the Monument to Bonnie Prince Charlie in today's Herald (Picture of the Day, March 13). In the Gaelic-speaking stronghold of Lewis the inscription on the monument is entirely in English.
The Gaels are their own worst enemies in the decline of one of Scotland's national languages.
Willie Douglas,
252 Nether Auldhouse Road, Glasgow.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel