LAST week’s findings from the Programme for International Student Assessment on education made sobering reading for the Scottish Government.
Scotland’s schools produced their worst ever results in the study, with performances in reading, maths and science declining in comparison to other countries.
Seventeen years into devolution, and nine years after the SNP took power, it is depressing to think we are going backwards in such a crucial area.
It is now clear that every aspect of schools policy - from how and when to test, to the multitude of bodies that help deliver the service - must be looked at anew.
A good place to start is Education Scotland, which has the dual function of shaping the curriculum and inspecting the schools that have to adhere to it.
In theory, an inspectorate’s role is simple: go into schools, without fear or favour, and provide information on performance that can be accessed by parents.
However, a shake-up of the system by Education Scotland could be bad news for parents who want basic details of their children’s schooling.
In the previous system, standards in schools were marked according to a six-point grading system that was easy to understand.
This regime has been retained for “full inspections”, but it is unclear whether three additional types of inspection will include this level of detail.
The background to this row is that opposition parties rightly criticised Education Scotland for reducing the number of inspections in schools.
Now it seems there is a chance some of the inspections will not equip parents with the knowledge they deserve from a service vital to their children’s life chances.
Education Scotland’s dual roles not only amount to a conflict of interest, but it also serves as a distraction. This organisation must be responsible for inspections and nothing else.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here