RUTH Davidson's astonishing announcement that the Scottish Tories are to now back free NHS prescriptions represents one of the most spectacular u-turns of any party at Holyrood in recent years.
The Sunday Herald supports free prescriptions as a vital part of a free health service that is in line with the founding principles of the NHS. Free prescriptions are part of a progressive policy agenda in Scotland, that includes free university tuition and free personal care for the elderly, which represent the real gains of devolution.
However, Ruth Davidson's statement of support for the policy is clearly a crude attempt to take the Scottish public for fools. Tory hostility to free prescriptions during the past decade of SNP rule went above and beyond simple opposition.
The Tories firmly set their face against the policy, with Davidson herself describing it as a "publicly-funded bribe" to win independence.
Ever since the phased introduction of free prescriptions by Alex Salmond's government during the 2007-11 parliament, calls to scrap free medicines have been a Tory set piece at Holyrood on budget day.
Despite stating that a change is now necessary due to increased drugs use in non-hospital care, Davidson freely admits the move is also motivated by the popularity of free prescriptions.
With the Scottish Tories seemingly poised to make General Election gains, it's clear Davidson is happy to steal the SNP's clothes where and when it helps her case.
Put simply, the Scottish Tories view support for free prescriptions as a tactical wheeze to tempt disillusioned Labour supporters, regardless of the blatant disparity with Theresa May's government which presides over prescription charges of £8.60 per item south of the Border.
The Scottish electorate is not comprised of fools. It is an astute and wise body of voters. It can only be hoped the people see through this shallow play, and are not lured by cheap opportunistic tricks.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here