LAST week’s chaotic events in Aberdeen summed up the impossible situation Kezia Dugdale finds herself in as Scottish Labour leader.
After the local government election, her party Executive ruled that it would possess a veto on any town hall deals proposed by Labour councillors.
A proposal by Aberdeen councillors for a coalition with the Tories was rejected by the Scottish Executive Committee, but the group pushed ahead with the tie-up anyway.
As this snub was a direct challenge to Dugdale’s authority, the nine councillors were suspended from the party and now sit without any central support from Labour.
Let’s be clear: Dugdale was in the right. The Executive is Labour’s democratically elected governing body and its decisions, whether you agree or not, have to be respected. If Dugdale had allowed councillors to ignore an Executive decision, all hell would have broken loose. The will of voters - who cast their ballot for Labour, and self-evidently therefore did not want to see Tories in power - would also have been flouted.
However, the drama has confirmed that Scottish Labour is trapped inside a cage of constitutional politics and does not know how to escape.
As a result of the independence referendum, voters now tend to back the party that best represents their views on the constitution.
For supporters of independence, the SNP is is obvious home; for Unionists, Ruth Davidson’s robust defence of the Union is equally attractive.
Labour, on the other hand, is fired up by social justice and not constitutional politics. The party is struggling to get onto the pitch, far less make an impact in the match.
This tension is also reflected internally in Scottish Labour. Most Labour members have an instinctive loathing of the Tories and are in politics to oppose Conservatism. Doing deals with the Tories does not come naturally.
But the referendum has also created a type of Labour member who dislikes the SNP more than the Tories. Aberdeen’s “Labour” councillors, it would seem, fall into this category.
It is impossible for Dugdale to keep both sides happy. If she blocks Tory deals, she alienates staunch Unionists in her party, such as donor Alan Massie. If she rule out pacts with the SNP, she risks annoying members who do not see the SNP as the devil incarnate.
While her party drowns in quicksand, Dugdale's challenge is to survive the general election and remain in post. If she is still leader after June 8, she will have an opportunity to try and change the conversation in Scottish politics. As was evident last week, it won’t be easy.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here