Amid the sound and fury over the Scottish Government’s education reform plan, one thing can be said with the utmost certainty. John Swinney, who has been Education Secretary for just over a year, does not trust councils to close the attainment gap and is determined to move to an alternative delivery mechanism.
His plan is to create a new tier of education “collaboratives” above councils and give cash to headteachers, rather than to local authorities.
On this basis, the Government found £120m to pay for the Pupil Equity Fund, with heads given the task of tackling the standards gap between children from poor and more affluent backgrounds.
However, for all the talk about headteachers being best placed to make decisions on their own schools, the drawbacks are obvious.
Heads are not sociologists, but they have been entrusted to spend huge sums of money on dealing with one of the trickiest problems in society.
There is no consensus for why an attainment gap exists - some people cite poverty and cuts, others believe teaching standards and discipline could be better - but the pressure is now on heads to deliver.
Our revelations today confirm sectoral concerns that some of the PEF money may simply be squandered.
If a headteacher downloads the “toolkit” on the Education Scotland website, they will find advice which states that canoeing and sailing lessons can have an impact in closing the gap.
Some of the ideas emanating from North Lanarkshire headteachers are also questionable. Will signing up to a Gaelic football programme really help tackle the poverty-related attainment gap? Can dodgeball improve literacy and numeracy?
Before he distributed £120m of public money to schools, Swinney should have ensured there was a greater understanding of what this new pot of money could be spent on.
A related fear, which was articulated by Glasgow schools chief Maureen McKenna, is that external consultants, or “snake oil salesmen” as she put it, could offer easy solutions in exchange for cash.
A better way of spending the money would to have a laser-like focus on literacy and numeracy initiatives for poorer children, as well as beefing up the number of classroom assistants.
As we also report today, to its credit - this time - North Lanarkshire council wanted to use PEF money to save over 100 classroom assistant posts, but the Scottish Government ruled it out. PEF money must not be frittered away on initiatives that do nothing to dent the attainment gap. At the very least, Audit Scotland should be involved in assessing whether the spending decisions of headteachers provide value for money.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here