THE Sunday Herald is not the type of newspaper which calls for bans every other week. 'Ban this filth' is never a headline you'll see in this paper. We are liberal in our attitudes, and believe all our readers are intelligent and worldly enough to decide for themselves whether something is good or bad.
However, the use of mobile phones in schools is a different matter. First of all, it is hardly draconian to say that schools should be a place of ordered learning and phones filled with apps and distraction should really have no place in a classroom.
However, concerns over the deleterious effect of the mobile phone on the attention spans of pupils is only the tip of the iceberg when it comes to their use in schools. As we report today, the mobile phone is now the instrument of criminal sexual abuse of girls and women teachers in schools across the land. Each day boys are taking illegal pictures of schoolgirls and female teachers without their consent, using them for their own titillation, posting them online and swapping them at school.
Even without this epidemic of grotesque voyeurism, the presence of phones in schools should already have been at the centre of a debate on the damage they do to learning - with the added horror of sexual abuse, it is clear that the days of the mobile must be numbered when it comes to the classroom. And so, we welcome the moves by cross-party parliamentarians to bring the issue before Holyrood. To the naysayers, who will claim phones are needed for learning, we would reply - read a book, use a classroom computer, ask the teacher. And to those who say phones are needed for parents to stay in touch with their children, we would suggest they ring the school office.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here