Twitter users who back Scottish independence are more likely to use Scottish words in their posts - except when tweeting about the referendum issue itself, analysis shows.
A computer-based study of thousands of tweets written during the 2014 referendum campaign looked at how people's use of language was related to their identity, views and discussion on the debate.
Scottish words - such as oor, yersel or bairns - were used more frequently by users who favoured pro-independence hashtags, but not necessarily in the same posts.
Overall, tweeters decreased their use of Scots words when discussing the referendum.
In the first large-scale study of its kind in the UK, experts found that people whose tweets suggested they identify as Scottish nationalists were more likely to use language that reflected this.
They also found that tweets with hashtags relating to the referendum, from either side of the debate, featured fewer identifiably Scottish words than other posts.
Researchers from the University of Edinburgh used computing techniques to identify thousands of tweets relating to the Scottish referendum.
They then carried out a statistical analysis of users and their posts to explore how people's use of language related to their position in the debate.
The study, presented at the European Association for Computational Linguistics conference, was supported by the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council.
Dr Sharon Goldwater of the University of Edinburgh's School of Informatics, who led the study, explained the findings.
She said: "People might be expected to use Scottish words more when discussing the referendum, but the opposite is true: this is because tweets with hashtags are intended to be seen by a broad audience."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel