The Brexit Repeal Bill has faced an immediate backlash from opposition parties and devolved governments, underlining the scale of the task the minority Government faces to get it through Parliament and into law.
Labour looks set to vote against the crucial legislation unless it is amended, because it states the European Charter of Fundamental Rights will not be put into UK law after the country’s withdrawal from the European Union.
Read more: Sturgeon and Jones reject "power-grab" Brexit repeal bill
The First Ministers of Scotland and Wales, Nicola Sturgeon and Carwyn Jones, said they would not grant the required legislative consent to the Bill as it stands, describing it as a “naked power grab” because it does not immediately return EU powers to devolved administrations.
FM @NicolaSturgeon with @fmwales responds to the UKG’s EU Withdrawal Bill: https://t.co/n9rf85kgIZ
— First Minister (@ScotGovFM) July 13, 2017
And the Liberal Democrats warned the Government faces “hell” over the Bill, and a “political nightmare” that could cost Theresa May her job as Prime Minister.
Their statements underlined the fierce battles ahead over the European Union (Withdrawal) Bill, in which a handful of Tory rebels could force the Government to change the legislation.
The EU Withdrawal Bill is an attack on devolution which could destabilise our economies. Read more here: https://t.co/pfwsDPMjTU https://t.co/QKlXG51d39
— Carwyn Jones (@fmwales) July 13, 2017
Acknowledging the tricky situation, Brexit Secretary David Davis appealed for parties to “work together” to ensure the UK has a functioning legal system on exit day, expected in March 2019.
“The eyes of the country are on us and I will work with anyone to achieve this goal and shape a new future for our country,” he said.
Read more: Sturgeon and Jones reject "power-grab" Brexit repeal bill
But the Government has already put itself on collision course with Labour, which poses a significant threat in parliamentary votes and has made the EU rights charter a “red line” for support.
It is understood ministers believe the rights in the charter are already contained in EU rules which the legislation will convert into domestic law on the day of Brexit.
Britain will also retain its own domestic rights and protections and remain a member of the European Convention on Human Rights, so the Government believes leaving the charter will not have a significant real-life effect.
Shadow Brexit secretary Sir Keir Starmer (PA)
Ministers are also likely to cite a report by the Women and Equalities Select Committee which says the charter would be “difficult to apply” in a domestic context alone.
But shadow Brexit secretary Sir Keir Starmer has made clear Labour would not support the Bill in its current form.
He demanded concessions in six areas, including incorporating the charter into UK law, ensuring workers’ rights in the UK do not fall behind those in the EU, and limiting the scope of so-called “Henry VIII powers”, which could allow the Government to alter legislation without full parliamentary scrutiny.
Read more: Sturgeon and Jones reject "power-grab" Brexit repeal bill
The Bill is designed to transpose EU law into British law so the same rules apply on the day of Brexit as the day before, while giving parliaments and assemblies in Westminster, Edinburgh, Belfast and Cardiff the power to drop or change them in the future.
The Government hopes it will give confidence to businesses, workers and consumers that they will not face unexpected changes on the day of Brexit, while ending the supremacy of EU law in the UK.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here