Farmers will be paid for delivering benefits for nature and the countryside after Brexit instead of receiving subsidies for the amount of land they farm, Michael Gove has indicated.
Under the Europe-wide Common Agricultural Policy UK farmers receive around £3 billion a year in subsidies, mostly linked to the amount of land they farm.
The Government has pledged to maintain levels of funding up to 2022, but Mr Gove said ministers could only go on “generously supporting farmers” in the face of other demands on spending if the environmental benefits were clear.
Delivering a #GreenBrexit – the Secretary of State on the future of #farming support pic.twitter.com/rKoa2PEccE
— Defra UK (@DefraGovUK) July 21, 2017
In his first major speech as Environment Secretary, Mr Gove said reform of the system was needed, with payments for woodland creation, habitat protection, caring for treasured landscapes and higher animal welfare.
Mr Gove said: “The Common Agricultural Policy rewards size of land-holding ahead of good environmental practice, all too often puts resources in the hands of the already wealthy rather than into the common good of our shared natural environment, and encourages patterns of land use which are wasteful of natural resources.”
He said the UK should take the opportunity presented by leaving the EU to reward farmers for environmental protection.
Investigations by Greenpeace’s Energydesk have revealed that one in five of the biggest recipients of European farming subsidies in Britain are billionaires and millionaires on the Sunday Times Rich List.
"We need to maintain and enhance the natural world around us" @michaelgove #environment speech #GreenBrexit pic.twitter.com/Rur1Ld0Rhw
— Defra UK (@DefraGovUK) July 21, 2017
Environmentalists want to see reform of the system to boost nature and protect UK wildlife.
The Country Land and Business Association (CLA), which represents 30,000 landowners, farmers and rural businesses in England and Wales, has also backed a move away from subsidies that simply pay people based on how much land they farm.
As the UK leaves the EU, the subsidy regime should be replaced with “land management contracts” – business contracts to manage land in ways that deliver public benefits, the CLA said.
Farmers would receive payments for delivering services such as storing carbon, managing water quality, connecting habitats, reducing flood risk or protecting famous beauty spots and important landscapes.
Our vision for a post Brexit agricultural policy is one that delivers value for money. Read more here https://t.co/I89kjJiqTo pic.twitter.com/0fJ9z6Lid7
— CLA (@CLAtweets) July 21, 2017
The moves could “end once and for all the divisive view that farmers are receiving subsidies for nothing”, CLA president Ross Murray said.
Mr Murray added: “Farmers and landowners want to run profitable, sustainable businesses. We want to produce quality food that receives a fair price and we accept the same risk and reward as any other business in our economy.
“Payments are necessary because there is vital work to be done across our countryside to manage soils and preserve the productive capacity of the land, to plant the trees we need, to clean and store water, to support the farming practices that make up our iconic landscapes or to make it possible for people to enjoy our beautiful natural spaces.
#HometimeReading: Read @michaelgove #environment speech The Unfrozen Moment – Delivering a #GreenBrexit : https://t.co/eEgiq8uBbG pic.twitter.com/Qy5HQ4UK0p
— Defra UK (@DefraGovUK) July 21, 2017
“These responsibilities bring costs and burdens that other businesses do not have to bear.
“That is why it is right to continue to invest public money in remunerating farmers to deliver the things people want from our countryside.”
The National Trust has also called for reform of the subsidy system to reward farmers for providing public benefits in the countryside.
Patrick Begg, National Trust rural enterprise director, said: “Michael Gove’s speech shows there’s a strong consensus that funding for farmers and land managers should be based on public money buying clear public benefits.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel