HEALTH, education and other services will suffer if the SNP use millions cutting airport tax for the "wealthy", Scottish Labour has claimed.
With the annual budget process getting underway, Labour urged Finance Secretary Derek Mackay to abandon plans to slash air passenger duty from next year.
All other parties at Holyrood bar the Tories oppose the measure, which is expected to cost £190m a year by 2021/22.
Air Passenger Duty currently adds between £13 and £26 to the price of a short-haul ticket for a flight from a UK airport and £75 to £150 for flights over 2000 miles.
Next April, APD will cease to exist in Scotland and be replaced by a devolved version, Air Departure Tax, which the SNP have vowed to halve by the end of the current parliament, and abolish when finances permit.
The government says it will boost air travel and the economy, while critics said it is a poor use of public funds and warn pollution from extra flights will add to climate change.
Labour MSP Neil Bibby said the £189m in lost revenue in 2021/22 was more than the £120m the SNP expected to spend on closing the attainment gap in schools.
He said: “It cannot be right that when we have a shortage of teachers and falling numeracy and literacy standards, the SNP is planning to lower taxes for frequent flyers."
Green MSP Patrick Harvie added: “This will take cash from public purse and hand it to the wealthiest; just the kind of thing the SNP rightly condemn Tories for doing at Westminster.”
“It is time for Derek Mackay to abandon this policy before he unveils his draft budget. If he doesn’t, he will need to explain where the £189m will be taken from to fund this tax cut.”
A spokesperson for Mr Mackay said: “Neil Bibby has still to apologise for spreading false smears about Scotrail trains earlier in the week – and until he does, no one can trust a word he says on anything.
“The fact is, Labour are still unable to offer any credible suggestions as to how they would boost Scotland’s international connectivity.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel