THE controversial £1 billion deal the Tories struck with Northern Ireland’s Democratic Unionists to gain a Commons majority on key votes will need to be approved by Westminster, it has emerged.
Responding to a legal letter from campaigner Gina Miller and the Independent Workers Union of Great Britain [IWGB], the Treasury solicitor said the investment package for Northern Ireland would have “appropriate parliamentary authorisation".
Ms Miller, whose legal action forced the UK Government to give MPs and peers a vote on triggering Article 50 which formally began the EU withdrawal process, said Theresa May should have made it clear at the time of the deal that it would need the approval of Parliament.
"It beggars belief that neither at the time the Government sealed its dubious deal with the DUP in exchange for their votes in the Commons nor at any point since has the Government made it clear that the £1 billion of taxpayers' money for Northern Ireland could only be handed over following parliamentary approval.
"We all need to know when the Government intended to come clean to Parliament, its parliamentary party, and the public.
"When was parliamentary time going to be found to authorise this payment? And did the DUP know the cheque the Government promised to pay might bounce?” asked Ms Miller.
She added: "On the day the Government is asking MPs to grant it sweeping new powers and in the week it is trying to pack parliamentary scrutiny committees to blatantly change the rules in their favour, MPs are entitled to wonder what else the Government may have 'forgotten' to tell them."
The Government said in the letter to Ms Miller that no timetable had been set for making the Northern Ireland payments.
Some Tory backbenchers have expressed unease about the "confidence and supply" agreement with the socially conservative DUP which sees its 10 MPs back the Government on key votes.
Jason Moyer-Lee, General Secretary of the IWGB, said: "Many IWGB members' jobs depend on public money like foster care workers and low-paid outsourced university staff.
"They are routinely told that there's no money available to improve their pay, holidays, and other terms and conditions they demand. Yet when it comes to keeping themselves in power, this Government's fiscal discipline quickly dissipates.”
He said there was undoubtedly a need for increased social spending throughout the UK but this should be on a basis of fairness, not on self-serving party politics.
"As a result of our threatened legal action the Government has admitted that the money can only be approved by Parliament. It is now for Parliament and MPs to vote according to the interests of working people across the whole UK," added Mr Moyer-Lee.
Peter Dowd, the Shadow Chief Secretary to the Treasury, said Chancellor Philip Hammond needed to reveal where the money for the deal was coming from.
He said: "The Treasury's admission of the need for a parliamentary vote on the £1bn DUP bribe is a clear indication that the Conservatives' chaotic attempts to circumvent Parliament must come to an end.
"We do not begrudge Northern Ireland getting the spending that it needs but people all across the UK are crying out for the investment, jobs, and decent pay which will only be delivered by the next Labour Government."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel