THE SNP has disputed claims by Phillip Hammond that he vowed to remove VAT paid by police and fire services in Scotland under pressure from Ruth Davidson.
Mr Hammond previously told the Commons that he had his "ear bent" by colleagues north of the border over VAT paid by police and fire services.
But SNP MP Alan Brown (Kilmarnock and Loudoun) said he had spoken to the Chancellor's office and no such meetings on VAT could be highlighted.
In his Budget speech, Mr Hammond said: "I am getting used to the new experience of having my ear bent by my 13 Scottish Conservative colleagues, most recently on the issue of Scottish Police and Fire VAT.
"So we will legislate to allow VAT refunds from April 2018."
Mr Brown, speaking during business questions, told Commons Leader Andrea Leadsom: "In amongst the spin of how powerful the new Scottish Tories are and how they secured that £40 million VAT exemption for police and fire services, yesterday I actually highlighted they come at a cost of £265 million per Scottish Tory.
"If they genuinely did do so much work in terms of the VAT exemption can she make a statement outlining why the Chancellor was not able to give me in writing a date of one meeting with any one of the 12 backbench Tories on VAT exemption?"
Since 2013 the SNP claims some £140 million has been slashed from frontline services to make VAT payments.
The situation arose as policing and fire services in Scotland were previously controlled by local councils which can claim back VAT.
The new national forces are controlled by the Scottish government, which cannot.
Responding to Mr Brown, Mrs Leadsom said: "Can I say I am delighted that he recognised the amazing work done by my friends the Scottish Conservatives.
"I share his enthusiasm for their assiduousness towards looking after the interests of their Scottish constituents.
"I am sure he will be delighted as I am that in our Budget a couple of weeks ago the Chancellor was able to confirm a £2 billion consequential budget boost for the Scottish Parliament."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel