THERESA May has attempted to head off a damaging backbench Tory rebellion on her flagship Brexit Bill by making the Remain faction a compromise offer on the post-Brexit customs issue.
Details of the olive branch came as the Prime Minister addressed a key meeting of the Conservatives’ backbench 1922 committee, urging potential rebels not to “undermine” her negotiating position with Brussels by backing a series of Lords amendments to the EU Withdrawal Bill.
Brokered by Sir Oliver Letwin, her former policy adviser, the compromise offer involves tabling a new amendment to the legislation, which pledges the Government to reach a "customs arrangement" with Brussels rather than the Lords’ bid for it to enter a new "customs union" with the EU.
Leading Remainer Nicky Morgan, the former UK Education Secretary, who had been prepared to vote against the Government on the customs issue, made clear she would support the new wording, saying it “buys the Government time”; a customs rebellion could still take place next month when the Brexit Trade and Customs Bills will be debated.
Robert Buckland, the Solicitor General, quoted Benjamin Franklin, the 18th century US politician, after signing the American Declaration of Independence, saying: “We hang together or we hang separately.” He added: “It's more than just about party unity, this is about the national interest.”
The latest move makes it increasingly likely that Mrs May will successfully navigate the series of potential knife-edge votes on Tuesday and Wednesday.
The closest result is likely to come Tuesday morning with the debate on the so-called “meaningful vote,” which would enable MPs to order UK ministers to renegotiate with Brussels should the Commons vote down the proposed Brexit deal this November.
- READ MORE: Key Brexit Bill flashpoints
Addressing her party colleagues at Westminster, the PM said: “We must think about the message Parliament will send to the European Union this week.
"I am trying to negotiate the best deal for Britain. I am confident I can get a deal that allows us to strike our own trade deals while having a border with the EU which is as frictionless as possible.
"But if the Lords amendments are allowed to stand, that negotiating position will be undermined," declared Mrs May.
Over the last few days she has been in contact with a number of potential rebels, seeking to persuade them not to oppose the Government.
At the weekend, she received some help when Amber Rudd, the former Home Secretary, and a leading Remainer, was joined by Iain Duncan Smith, the onetime party leader and senior Brexiteer, who jointly called on colleagues to “demonstrate discipline and unity of purpose in support of the Prime Minister”.
Some pro-EU Tories were thought to be backing away amid fears Mrs May could be fatally damaged by defeat, opening the way for a hardline Brexiteer to take over at the top of the party.
Meanwhile, Jeremy Corbyn was facing his own rebellion. One Lords amendment calls for Britain to remain in the single market as part of the European Economic Area, the so-called Norway option.
The Labour leadership believes this would be unsuitable for Britain but Scottish MPs Ian Murray and Martin Whitford have already made clear they will support the proposed change.
Mr Murray, who represents Edinburgh South, said: “The power to save thousands of jobs is in Labour’s hands. If we fail to back EEA membership and allow the Tories to destroy our economy, it will be a shameful day for the Labour Party.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel