BORIS Johnson's idea for a new brightly coloured "Brexit plane" to help him sell Global Britain abroad has failed to get off the ground.
Speaking on an official tour of Latin America the Foreign Secretary had said the RAF Voyager jet shared by the Prime Minister, senior Cabinet members and the Royal Family "never seems to be available".
He also suggested its drab grey colour scheme undermined its impact as a travelling symbol of Britain.
But a Downing Street source insisted it was not aware of "any plans for the current transport situation to change".
He also pointed out the grey colour scheme was because the aircraft, a military adaptation of an Airbus A330, was still used "operationally to do important things like refuelling" as the Foreign Secretary was aware.
Mr Johnson is conducting his current five-day tour of Latin America by commercial flights, taking a variety of airlines as he hops from Peru to Argentina and Chile with an entourage of officials and press.
He had to stop off in Madrid to change planes on his Air Europa service from London to Lima, adding five hours to the journey time, because the only direct flight on offer did not fit his schedule.
But he insisted it was not his own comfort he was concerned about, using an arcane term for staying overnight as he joked: "We are hard as nails, we Foreign Office types. We don't care about changing planes; we pernoctate on planes."
Asked if he would like to have a "Brexit plane", he told reporters: "If there's a way of doing it that is not exorbitantly expensive then, yes, we probably do need something.
"The taxpayers won't want us to have some luxurious new plane but it's striking that we don't seem to have access to such a thing at the moment," added Mr Johnson.
Tony Blair's plans for a prime ministerial jet - branded "Blair Force One" for its similarity to the US President's private airliner - were dumped on the grounds of cost by his successor Gordon Brown.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel