MPS are often accused of talking pants but yesterday they went out of their way to air their enthusiasm for Marks and Spencer's underwear amid serious concerns over the High Street giant's future.
Claire Perry, the Business Minister, revealed she was wearing three items of M&S clothing but, sensibly, declined to declare what they were, before noting how many people tended to buy their "unmentionable items" online due to changing shopping habits.
Later, Labour's Ian Mearns was less discreet, declaring how his "boxer shorts and socks" were from the store, which prompted Commons Leader Andrea Leadsom to reply: "In response to his mention of Marks & Spencer and boxer shorts I'd be tempted to say knickers but,” turning to the Speaker, added: “I'm not sure if you'd rule it out of order."
John Bercow, who said he shared the Minister’s “enthusiasm for Marks & Spencer,” opted to play it safe by declaring that he was wearing an M&S - suit.
The sartorial exchanges punctuated more serious remarks about the planned 100-plus store closures by M&S by 2022 and the potential threat to hundreds of jobs with the SNP's Lisa Cameron, who secured the Urgent Question in the Commons, warning the changes could "devastate town centres".
The MP for East Kilbride, Strathaven and Lesmahagow said she recognised the market was changing but added retail companies needed to "strike a balance" between remaining competitive and understanding the wider implications of closing "landmark" stores.
Ms Perry said the M&S plan had been well advertised and was designed to help the chain compete with online retailers.
She pointed out staff were being consulted about redeployment to other stores, telling MPs: "All of us should think it is a worrying time for the over 600 staff members who are currently going through that process.
"I know there will be concern on all sides of the House about this and the Government will of course stand by with the Department for Work and Pensions and Jobcentre Plus to work with the company should support be required," added the minister.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here