THE votes have been cast, the papers counted, the declarations made, and Alex Salmond’s giant disconsolate face rolled up like a poster and stuck in a cupboard till 2021.
All that remains of the general election is to say who won. That’s where it gets tricky.
Going by the first FMQs since polling day it appears pretty much everyone triumphed.
Certainly Tory Ruth Davidson thought she’d done well and the SNP had honked it.
“The SNP lost half a million votes and 21 MPs after the First Minister put her plan for a second independence referendum at the heart of her campaign. Does she think that was a mistake?”
It was a strange question, as it’s well known Nicola Sturgeon doesn’t do mistakes.
“The SNP won the election in Scotland!” she chirruped, ignoring the 21 stiffs at her feet.
However, as you do after an unambiguous win, she would also reflect carefully on the result.
Before anyone clocked the contradiction, the FM immediately upended Ms Davidson’s plan of attack by going on the offensive herself.
By prattling about Indyref2, Ms Davidson was guilty of a “dereliction of duty”, she said. She ought to be thinking about the looming horror of the UK entering Brexit talks without a map.
“We are going to be led off the cliff edge by a Tory Government that is devoid of legitimacy and credibility and utterly clueless,” she said as gentle warm-up.
Mr Davidson said she was hiding behind a “Brexit bogeyman” and tried to talk referenda.
The FM pounced. Here was proof Ms Davidson was “nothing more than a one-trick pony”.
On any topic other than a second referendum "she is left floundering”, she cried.
Actually, Ms Davidson is quite good at her trick. Ask her to bang a hoof for every independence referendum and she stops at one. It got her twelve stablemates.
But as Nat MSPs roared like a gymkhana of chaos, the FM followed up with a haymaker about the Tories and their “grubby deal” with the DUP.
No longer the best in show, Ms Davidson suddenly looked a short trot from the knacker’s yard.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here