Celtic chief executive Peter Lawwell is one of several possible candidates for one of the most powerful positions in club football after Karl-Heinz Rummenigge announced he will not run for re-election as the chairman of the European Club Association.
The former Bayern Munich, Inter Milan and Germany striker has chaired the ECA since it replaced the G-14 group of Europe’s biggest clubs in 2008. Still chairman at Bayern, the 61-year-old has helped the ECA grow to 220 member clubs from 53 associations.
In a statement, Rummenigge said: “Following intense, successful and good years, I believe the time has come to pass on the responsibility.
“I have always believed this office should only be held for a limited amount of time. My withdrawal from office expresses my sincerity concerning this issue.
“We can be proud of what we achieved in cooperation with FIFA and UEFA – all of our players are now insured for all international fixtures and the clubs now receive compensation when their professionals participate in a World or European Championship.
“Furthermore, the clubs now have two seats on the UEFA executive board and are thus involved in scheduling the match calendar and other vital decisions concerning the clubs.”
The ECA was created as part of a deal with FIFA and UEFA on various issues, most notably insurance for players whilst on international duty.
Whereas the G-14, which was founded in 2000, was frequently in conflict with FIFA and UEFA, the ECA has enjoyed a much closer relationship with the sport’s governing bodies, particularly UEFA. This is largely a result of the huge revenues Europe’s biggest clubs have earned from the expanded Champions League.
Rummenigge’s replacement will be announced at the next ECA board elections in Geneva on September 5 and current board members Ivan Gazidis of Arsenal, Lawwell and Manchester United executive vice chairman Ed Woodward could stand.
Listen to the Herald Sport podcast: We discuss Kieran Tierney's Celtic future, Rangers battering Dunfermline and ponder a Motherwell cup victory.
Download this episode (right click and save) or alternatively listen on Podbean or iTunes.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel