IT was with a quite impeccable sense of timing that a group of former and current match day delegates, all of whom had requested anonymity, voiced their concerns about how little the football authorities in this country were doing to tackle sectarianism earlier this week.

Just a day later, amid widespread rejoicing among academics, clubs, officials, police officers, politicians, prominent public figures and supporters, the contentious Offensive Behaviour at Football Act was repealed.

Those who opposed the act argued that it was ineffective and unnecessary and pointed out police and the courts already had sufficient powers to punish the sort of conduct it was introduced to tackle.

“It is wrong to create a law which applies to one demonised sector of society,” a petition which received 9,000 signatures and was handed in to the Scottish parliament three years ago stated with undeniable logic.

“This legislation was a clumsy political response to one football match (the infamous Old Firm game at Celtic Park back in 2011) which serves only to unjustly criminalise football supporters.”

All four opposition parties clearly agreed. The SNP government was outvoted by 62 to 60 at Holyrood on Thursday. The act will be taken off the statute book next month. Few will mourn its passing.

Neil Lennon, a man who knows as well as anyone about the darker side of the game in this country, is of the view that huge strides forward have been made in the battle against this age-old problem in recent years.

“I think it is better,” the Hibernian manager said. “The majority of supporters in the country now are supporting within the laws of the game.”

Alas, the match delegates who spoke to BBC Scotland of their experiences disagreed. They are distressed by the fact that nothing continues to be done to address what they are convinced remains, albeit to a lesser degree than in the past, a problem in the Scottish game.

“It was so frustrating,” said a former delegate. “I know that some of those who are still working today are absolutely appalled that nothing has changed. It seems like the Scottish Professional Football League (SPFL) is content to sweep the issue under the carpet.”

The SPFL employ match delegates to ensure their rules are adhered to during matches and reporting sectarian signing comes within their remit.

But one pointed out: “We had numerous meetings with the police, who told us which songs to look out for, but it was pointless because when we reported them, nothing was ever done.”

The reasons for that is there is, unlike in the Champions League, Europa League, Premier League in England and many other leagues around Europe, no strict liability rule in Scotland.

If a club can show they took all necessary precautions to prevent acts of delinquency before a game and then illustrate they took measures against those responsible for misconduct afterwards then they will escape punishment.

There is no appetite for strict liability to be introduced in this country either. Those who oppose it believe it is open to abuse. A rival fan, they say, could infiltrate the support of the team he detests and act in a manner which will result in a fine or sporting sanction.

But if Scottish football is unprepared to take action then others may be. James Kelly, the Labour MSP stressed that a “much wider and more serious conversation” was needed to tackle sectarianism and offered to work with the government on the issue.

Regardless of how well meaning his intentions are, the prospect of our elected representatives once again involving themselves in to football matters, something which both UEFA and FIFA take a decidedly dim view of, is an unappealing one.

Matches in Scotland are still blighted by chants about “Fenians” and “Huns” and other phrases which have no place in the modern game and the fact they are broadcast around Britain, Europe and the world on television continue to reflect badly on this country.

The Offensive Behaviour at Football Act may be soon be no more, and good riddance to it, but the clubs, the SFA and the SPFL must now act themselves and stamp out what remains a concerning issue.