Simona Halep secured her second Rogers Cup title with a thrilling victory over Sloane Stephens in Montreal.
In a repeat of this year's French Open final, also won by Halep, the world No.1 ran out a 7-6 (8/6), 3-6, 6-4 winner in a pulsating match of high quality and high drama.
Both players looked on the verge of collapsing with exhaustion as they embraced at the net after a marathon battle lasting two hours and 41 minutes.
In sweltering conditions and amid some brutally long rallies, both were regularly doubled up, struggling for breath.
Halep broke serve in the third game and, although Stephens forced a break point in the next, she could not capitalise.
Romanian Halep broke again for 4-1, but amid some fiercely contested rallies Stephens hit back for 4-4.
They exchanged breaks again, Halep failing to serve out the set with American Stephens by now looking the more composed.
Yet Halep saved two set points, and two more in the tie-break, before eventually taking the opener after 70 punishing minutes.
A run of three consecutive breaks at the start of the second was halted by Stephens, who will defend her US Open title later this month, to move 3-1 ahead.
The third seed held on to that advantage before converting a fourth set point on the Halep serve to level an enthralling encounter.
It was Halep who drew first blood in the decider, but Stephens, looking the fresher of the two, pegged her back at 2-2.
However, Halep called on all her reserves of energy to break the resilience of the third seed, shrugging off a double fault at championship point along the way, as she completed a memorable victory.
Halep said on court afterwards: "It's been an amazing week and I feel like I reached my best level of tennis.
"I just didn't give up during the tournament, I fought until the end."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here