Lewis Hamilton stood by Mercedes' decision to manufacture his controversial win in Russia that takes him ever closer to a fifth world championship.
Hamilton will head into the final five rounds with an almost uncatchable 50-point lead over Ferrari's Sebastian Vettel after team-mate Valtteri Bottas was ordered out of his way at the Sochi Autodrom.
Bottas was in complete control of the race only for Mercedes to instruct him to step aside with 30 laps remaining.
To the absolute credit of Mercedes, they have avoided using team orders in their recent history, but with Vettel still in striking range of Hamilton, they adopted a change of tact here, denying Bottas his first win of 2018 and handing their star driver seven extra, and potentially, critical points.
Hamilton was a reluctant winner, and chose not to celebrate. Instead, he immediately sought to console Bottas.
This type of victory is not Hamilton's style. Instead, he invited Bottas to join him on the top step of the podium, and even appeared to suggest to the deflated Finn that he should lift the winners' trophy in front of the watching Russian president Vladimir Putin, who arrived for the concluding laps.
Bottas stared vacantly as the national anthems were played, and the mood had eased little by the time both Mercedes drivers appeared alongside Vettel for the post-race press conference.
"It doesn't feel great," Hamilton said. "I definitely don't think I have finished first in my career, and feel the way that I do right now.
"Only time will tell if it was necessary, but if we were to lose the championship by one point, would you look back at this race and think we should have worked as a team?
"We are a team, and the team want to win both the drivers' and constructors' championships, so that is why the bosses took the decision."
Toto Wolff, team principal for the Silver Arrows, admitted it was an agonising decision, and one which led to him enduring a restless night on Saturday after Bottas beat Hamilton to pole.
Team orders were regular practice for Ferrari during Michael Schumacher's commanding era. Some, rather harshly, compared this result to the farce of Austria in 2002 when Rubens Barrichello was instructed to move out of Schumacher's way on the final lap.
Such was the uproar, that it resulted in a ban on team orders which Ferrari breached when they ordered Felipe Massa aside for Fernando Alonso in Germany in 2010.
At the end of that year, the ban was lifted. Unlike on both those occasions, Bottas, 110 points behind Hamilton before Sunday's race, stood no chance of winning the title.
"At the end, if five points or three points are missing then you are the biggest idiot on the planet by prioritising Valtteri's race over the championship," Wolff said.
"Somebody needs to be the baddie and it's me today. You need to weigh it up. To be the baddie on Sunday evening, for many right reasons, or be the idiot in Abu Dhabi at the end of the season. I'd rather be the baddie today."
Bottas was leading after he held off Hamilton and Vettel on the opening-lap drag race to turn two. Hamilton was slow out of his starting blocks, but kept Vettel at bay only to fall behind the German when he stopped for tyres.
The strategy error provoked a furious reaction from Wolff, who smashed his fist on a table as he watched on from the Mercedes garage. Hamilton took less than two laps to pass Vettel, but damaged his tyres in the process.
Mercedes feared the damage would leave him exposed, so on lap 23, Bottas' race engineer, Tony Ross, delivered the bad news. "You need to let Lewis by into turn 13 of this lap," he said.
Bottas slowed down, moved to the right, and Hamilton took the position before cruising to a victory that leaves him on the brink of his fourth championship in five years with only 125 points to play for.
Kimi Raikkonen finished fourth, while Max Verstappen drove spectacularly from 19th to fifth on his 21st birthday.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here