Anthony Crolla and Ricky Burns are to fight at lightweight on October 7 at the Manchester Arena as they attempt to rebuild their careers following defeat.
Scotland's Burns, 34, lost his WBA light-welterweight title to the classy Julius Indongo in April and returns to the division in which he secured his finest wins.
Similarly, the 30-year-old Crolla lost his WBA lightweight title to Jorge Linares last September and then their rematch in March.
A further defeat for either fighter would likely take a return to world level beyond them, and at a time when there is optimism fellow British lightweight Luke Campbell can win the WBA title against Linares next month.
"A win puts us back in the mix for titles," Manchester's Crolla said. "I'm not going to say the loser has nowhere to go, but it's going to be a tough road back.
"We're both coming off losing our world titles and the incentive is to win the fight and get back in the frame.
"I could have a tune up fight on the undercard of somewhere and an easier opponent to get me back into things and then a big fight after but I'm not interested in that.
"(A fight between us has) nearly happened before a good few times, a few years ago at super-featherweight and again at lightweight.
"It's been talked about for years now. It looked like it wasn't going to happen but it's good now we're finally going to meet."
Burns also had the option of fighting promising compatriot Josh Taylor at 10st, but he said: "I've been making 140lbs too easily and I've had enough notice for this fight.
"Although those last pounds will always be tricky I'm happy to be back down at 135lbs.
"I'm always saying to Tony (Sims, his trainer) I've got two or three more years left. At this stage of my career I don't see the point in getting an easy win. I'd rather go in with a big name.
"If I win, I'm going to progress and hopefully get another title shot."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here